Опыт динамического наблюдения колонизации верхних дыхательных путей пациента с муковисцидозом штаммом Roseomonas aerofrigidens на фоне приема препаратов таргетной терапии

Полный текст

Introduction

Cystic fibrosis remains one of the most significant genetic diseases, characterized by a unique microbiological landscape and significant species breadth. In addition to the “classic” species for this disease, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Burkholderia cepacia complex, Achromobacter xylosoxidans/ruhlandii, whose clinical significance in the development of bacterial complications of the respiratory tract is beyond doubt. In recent years, the question of the role of environmental microorganisms with unspecified clinical significance in cystic fibrosis has become relevant. These include bacterium Roseomonas aerofrigidens. These microorganisms are gram-negative coccobacilli belonging to class Alphaproteobacteria. They have a low growth rate, giving visible growth no earlier than 2–3 days of incubation, depending on the type of growth media used. According to the literature, the strains can grow on simple nutrient media, on MacConkey medium, but the best growth noted when culturing on Sabouraud medium. Growth is given in the form of slimy colonies, moist with a shiny surface from pale pink to coral-salmon shade. When examined microscopically, they look like gram-negative coccobacilli or thick rods, located in pairs or in the form of separate chains. Many of them can be mobile due to one or two polar flagella. Their biochemical activity is well studied. Meanwhile, representatives of the genus Roseomonas are quite rarely isolated from biological samples from humans. There are descriptions of the isolation of strains from blood, wound discharge, exudate, fragments of ureters and fluid for peritoneal dialysis [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. However, in the available sources there are practically no descriptions of the isolation of these strains from respiratory samples from patients with cystic fibrosis, especially cases of chronic colonization.

Materials and methods

To assess the prevalence of these microorganisms among patients with cystic fibrosis in the Russian Federation undergoing regular microbiological examination at the microbiological laboratory of the Clinics of Samara State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, an analysis of the results of 12 094 clinical material cultures was performed for the period from January 2019 to July 2024. The isolated cultures were identified using MALDI-ToF mass spectrometry (Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Germany). Visualization of the results of statistical proteomic comparison of the mass spectra of the isolated strains was carried out using MALDI Biotyper 3.0 Offline Classification software (Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Germany). For the studied strains, the Composite Correlation Index was calculated using the BioTyper Composite Correlation Standard Method. To assess the biological diversity of the microbiota isolated from nasal lavage fluid over time, the consistency criterion C was used. When assessing the indicator with a prevalence of microorganisms less than 25% in the overall structure of isolated representatives, the species was regarded as a transient microbiota participant. With an isolation frequency from 25 to 50%, the species was regarded as a representative of additional microbiota, and in the case of presence in more than 50% of samples from the locus, as a permanent participant in the microbiome. In addition, to assess the nature of symbiotic or antagonistic interactions within the considered community of the biotope, the Jaccard similarity coefficient (q) was calculated. With a value of q < 30%, the species were considered as antagonists, q = 30–70% — as synergists, q > 70% as mutualists.

Results and discussion

During the period of research, 20 strains of Roseomonas spp. bacteria were isolated. In four cases, the strain was isolated from the mucous membrane of the posterior pharyngeal wall, in all other cases isolated from nasal lavage fluid. Single episodes of isolation were noted among 13 patients, which could be explained by transient carriage, and one patient, at the time of describing this case, had a history of seven-fold cultures from nasal lavage fluid.

Patient K., born in 2013, has genetics F508del/F508del. Since October 2022, he has been receiving two-component targeted therapy. Before the start of therapy, patient had no cultures of clinically significant gram-negative types of microorganisms from respiratory samples. He also had no cultures of strains of Roseomonas aerofrigidens in his medical history. Since the start of targeted therapy, the patient has undergone regular microbiological monitoring. At the time of the case description, the patient had 18 months of microbiological monitoring of sputum and nasal lavage fluid. At the third, fifth, sixth, eighth, ninth, eleventh and eighteenth months of observation, Roseomonas aerofrigidens cultures were noted from nasal lavage fluid, with no growth of the strain in sputum. Growth was obtained on OFPBL medium (HiMedia, India) in the form of pink mucous colonies, shown in figure (Fig. 1). No hemolytic activity was detected when reseeding on Columbia agar with 5% sheep blood, and no phospholipase activity was detected when culturing on yolk-salt agar. When culturing on chromogenic agar (Conda, Spain), mucous pink colonies identical to those obtained on OFPBL medium were obtained.

 

Figure 1. Growth of Roseomonas aerofrigidens on OFPBL agar

 

When studying the characteristics of the protein profiles of the isolates, it was found that they have a high degree of kinship (correlation index over 0.8), which confirms our hypothesis that the patients paranasal sinuses had been colonized the with the same strain of Roseomonas aerofrigidens for several months (CCI matrix is shown in the figure) (Fig. 2). When assessing the consistency criterion C, it was found that 2 out of 30 microorganism isolated from nasal lavage fluid during 18 months of observation, were classified as representatives of the constant microbiota (Staphylococcus aureus — consistency criterion of 75%, Sphingomonas paucimobilis — consistency criterion of 50%). Four representatives were classified as additional microbiota. Among them are Roseomonas aerofrigidens, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Chryseobacterium taihuense and Acinetobacter junii with criterion values of 44.8, 37.5, 31.3 and 25%, respectively. The remaining species: Kocuria rhizophila, Brevibacterium rhamnosus, Acinetobacter pitti, Staphylococcus pasteuri, Brevundimonas aurantiaca, Neisseria flavescens, Microbacterium paraoxydans, Microbacterium aurum, Commamonas aquatica, Acinetobacter johnsonii, Sphingobacterium miltivorans, Rhizobium radiobacter, Brevundimonas albigilva, Pseudomonas stutzeri, Staphylococcus intermedius, Chryseobacterium hamamense, Kocuria marinae, Acidovorax temperans, Streptococcus oralis, Acinetobacter ursungii, Microbacterium estacenum, Moraxella catarrhalis, Sphingomonas panni were classified as representatives of random microbiota, having C criterion less than 25%. To determine the conjugacy of taxa for pairs of species belonging to the constant and additional microflora, the Jaccard coefficient was calculated, the results of which were presented in the figure (Table). It was found that a synergistic nature of the relationship was determined for four pairs of microorganisms highlighted in orange. Presented observations demonstrate an example of a very rare and previously undescribed case of multi-month colonization by a unique strain of Roseomonas aerofrigidens of a patient with cystic fibrosis receiving targeted therapy. It is noted that before the start of pathogenetic treatment, the patient had no episodes of excretion of the presented microorganism. At the same time, from a clinical point of view, despite colonization, the patient has not yet shown any deterioration in condition, both in terms of subjective signs (absence of complaints) and from the standpoint of the conclusion of computed tomography of the sinuses. It should be noted that, in all likelihood, we are talking about isolated sinonasal colonization, since during the entire observation period, we did not obtain any growth of the strain from sputum or oropharyngeal samples.

 

Figure 2. CCI matrix for Roseomonas aerofrigidens strains isolated from patient K. at 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11 and 18 months of therapy

 

Table. Jaccard coefficient for species isolated from patient K. during 18 months of observation

Species	A	B	C	Q
S. paucimobilis + R. aerofrigidens	8	7	5	50.0%*
S. paucimobilis + S. aureus	8	12	4	25.0%
S. paucimobilis + S. epidermidis	8	6	2	16.7%
S. paucimobilis + C. taihuense	8	5	1	8.3%
S. paucimobilis + A. junii	8	4	1	9.1%
R. aerofrigidens + S. aureus	7	12	5	28.6%
R. aerofrigidens + S. epidermidis	7	6	4	44.4%*
R. aerofrigidens + C. taihuense	7	5	3	33.3%*
R. aerofrigidens + A. junii	7	4	1	9.1%
S. aureus + S. epidermidis	12	6	4	28.6%
S. aureus + C. taihuense	12	5	3	21.4%
S. aureus + A. junii	12	4	2	14.2%
S. epidermidis + C. taihuense	6	5	2	22.2%
S. epidermidis + A. junii	6	4	0	0%
C. taihuense + A. junii	4	4	2	33.3%*

Note. A — number of samples in which the first microorganism was isolated; B — number of samples in which the second microorganism was isolated; C — number of samples in which both microorganisms of the pair were isolated; Q — Jaccard coefficient; * — species for which synergistic relationships have been determined.

 

Conclusion

In recent years, due to the optimization and improvement of quality of microbiological diagnostics, the number of isolation of rare species of microorganisms with unknown clinical significance has increased. To understand their potential role in the development of infectious complications, it is necessary to accumulate experience in isolation and knowledge of their biological properties, pathogenetic potential not only in isolation within microbiological laboratories, but also by assessing the relationship between the indicated cases of strain isolation and the clinical dynamics of the patient, the results of his instrumental and physical examination methods.

Об авторах

Е. Д. Джовмардова

ФГБОУ ВО Самарский государственный медицинский университет Минздрава России

Email: i.v.zalevskiy@samsmu.ru

аспирант кафедры медицинской микробиологии и иммунологии 

Россия, Самара

М. В. Сергеева

ФГБОУ ВО Самарский государственный медицинский университет Минздрава России

Email: i.v.zalevskiy@samsmu.ru

аспирант кафедры медицинской микробиологии и иммунологии 

Россия, Самара

О. В. Кондратенко

ФГБОУ ВО Самарский государственный медицинский университет Минздрава России

Email: i.v.zalevskiy@samsmu.ru

д.м.н., доцент, и.о. зав. кафедрой медицинской микробиологии и иммунологии

Россия, Самара

И. В. Залевский

ФГБОУ ВО Самарский государственный медицинский университет Минздрава России

Автор, ответственный за переписку.
Email: i.v.zalevskiy@samsmu.ru

специалист лаборатории трансляционных технологий и междисциплинарных связей Научно-образовательного профессионального центра генетических и лабораторных технологий 

Россия, Самара

Т. Р. Никитина

ФГБОУ ВО Самарский государственный медицинский университет Минздрава России

Email: i.v.zalevskiy@samsmu.ru

к.м.н., доцент, доцент кафедры медицинской микробиологии и иммунологии 

Россия, Самара

Список литературы

Дополнительные файлы