Prevalence and antibiotics susceptibility of thermotolerant Campylobacter spp. isolated from humans and chickens in the Republic of Guinea

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Background. The issue of diarrheal diseases remains relevant for modern health care in all countries. Campylobacteriosis is the most common infectious disease with foodborne transmission and poultry meat is a transmission factor. Materials and methods. 724 items of faeces sampled from patients with diarrheal syndrome and 283 samples of faeces of chickens raised on private farms and five poultry farms in the province were studied. For bacteriological method were used selective media. Traditional routine tests (cell morphology, cytochrome oxidase, catalase, hydrolysis of sodium hippurate and indoxyl acetate) and MALDI-ToF mass spectrometry was performed for identification. The susceptibility of strains to antibiotics was analysed using the disc-diffusion method. Results were interpreted according to the EUCAST criteria, versions 2019–2022. Results. Campylobacter spp. was cultured in 65 out of 724 faecal samples from patients with acute diarrhoea, of them 83.08% were identified as C. jejuni, and 16.92% as C. coli. Of the 237 Campylobacter strains from chicken were identified as C. jejuni (54.0%), as C. coli (46.0%). Campylobacter spp. strains from humans were resistant to tetracycline (40.0%), to erythromycin (6.15%), to ciprofloxacin (12.31%). The strains from chickens kept on farms, were resistant to tetracycline in 42.55%, to ciprofloxacin — in 22.70% and to erythromycin — in 11.35%. The strains from chickens kept on private farms were resistant to tetracycline in 4.17%, to ciprofloxacin — in 1.04%, all strains were sensitive to erythromycin. Conclusion. Thus, due to the widespread prevalence of Campylobacter spp., infectious diseases they cause remain a topical issue. Studying the resistance to antibiotics in Campylobacter spp. among poultry could allow to develop new approaches to confirming the significance of their foodborne nature and to improve the national disease prevention system.

Full Text

Introduction

The issue of diarrheal diseases remains relevant for modern health care in all countries. This is due to the wide range of diverse pathogens that cause diarrheal diseases, their wide distribution, as well as significant socio-economic impact. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) Expert Committee, they occupy the fourth place on the “importance scale” of the Global Burden of Disease and are included in the list of emergent foodborne infections affecting over 500 million people every year, of which 220 million are children under 5 years old [13].

Campylobacter is among the main causes of gastroenteritis worldwide and has increased in both developed and developing countries over the last 10 years. It accounts for 8.5% of the total number of diarrheal diseases reported [8, 12, 14].

The genus Campylobacter was first reported in 1886 by Theodor Escherich who discovered these microorganisms in a deceased child during an outbreak of “children’s cholera” and described them as uncultivated spiral-shaped bacteria. At the beginning of the 20th century, in humans learned of a widespread Campylobacter distribution among animals and their significance in reproductive system pathologies. In 1906, veterinarians McFadyean and Stockman found Campylobacter in smears from the uterine mucosa of a pregnant sheep as “a large number of unusual microorganisms”; in 1913, similar microorganisms were sampled from an aborted cow foetus and thus named Vibrio fetus. In 1927, Smith and Orcutt named a group of bacteria sampled from cattle faeces in diarrhoea Vibrio jejuni. Seventeen years later, in 1944, Doyle sampled bacteria from the faeces of pigs with diarrhoea that differed in biochemical properties from previously isolated Vibrio jejuni and classified them as Vibrio coliCampylobacter (V. fetus) were first sampled from human blood in 1947 [8]. Initially, all the above bacteria were assigned to the genus Vibrio and, despite having significant differences in biological properties from the “true” Vibrio spp., they were classified as an independent genus Campylobacter only in 1963. In 1969, Dekeyser first sampled Campylobacter from the faeces of patients with diarrhoea by direct membrane filtration on a selective agar medium. The development and increased use of selective media for the sampling of Campylobacter in the late 1970s and early 1980s led, on the one hand, to the recognition of the significance of said microorganisms as those causing acute intestinal conditions in humans, and, on the other hand, to the improvement of laboratory diagnostic methods and discovery of new species [5].

As of December 2022, the genus Campylobacter includes 43 species, and almost half of them may cause various human diseases, including gastroenteritis. In countries with developed laboratory diagnostics of campylobacteriosis, thermotolerant Campylobacter species C. jejuni and C. coli are considered the most significant causative agents of gastroenteritis. Other species of this Campylobacter group, C. lary, C. concisus, C. ureolyticus and C. upsaliensis, may cause diarrhoea too, but less often [8, 17].

Campylobacter infection is characterised by its impact on the gastrointestinal tract. It may manifest as enteritis, enterocolitis, colitis or gastroenterocolitis and result in serious gastrointestinal or extraintestinal complications [5, 27]. Immunocompromised humans (patients with AIDS, cancer, etc.), as well as infants are most vulnerable to complications. An acute infection can have serious long-term consequence, including the peripheral neuropathies, Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS) and Miller–Fisher syndrome (MFS), and functional bowel diseases, such as irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). GBS occurs in one in 1000 cases in people who have had campylobacteriosis. Older males get sick more often than females [3].

Campylobacteriosis is diagnosed based on the results of faeces examination using laboratory diagnostic methods, that is, bacteriology, molecular and immunology tests aimed at identifying the pathogen or its antigens and genetic markers [2, 21]. In countries that established observation practices for foodborne infections, it was found that C. jejuni is the main cause of foodborne outbreaks and one of the most important zoonotic pathogens capable of causing human diseases [4, 13, 20].

Epidemiological features of campylobacteriosis are studied in detail in most industrialised countries, as they record large outbreaks with foodborne transmission type. In the European Union, including the European Economic Area (EU/EEA), 30 countries reported 129 960 confirmed cases of campylobacteriosis in 2021. The overall recording rate was 44.5 per 100 000 population [16]. Despite the decrease in the incidence of Campylobacter infection over the past 3 years in a range of countries in North, Central and South America, thermotolerant Campylobacter spp. are the leading causative agents of bacterial diarrhoea in Europe, as well as in Australia and New Zealand. The number of confirmed cases in the European Union in 2020 reached 121 000 cases, whereas the incidence was 40.4‰ [1, 26].

Epidemiological data from a number of countries of Africa, Asia and the Middle East is incomplete; however, it shows that Campylobacter infection is relevant for these regions as well [23]. The results of 10-year studies (1997–2007) conducted using the molecular method based on RT-PCR in Blantyre (Malawi, Africa) showed that Campylobacter are often causative agents of diarrheal diseases in children; C. jejuni and C. coli were detected in every fifth child hospitalised with diarrhoea and in 14% of the cases where examinations found no signs of an acute intestinal infection, while C. jejuni accounted for up to 85% of all cases of campylobacteriosis [18]. These results are confirmed by another study conducted in Moramanga (Madagascar), in which the proportion of Campylobacter spp. was 8.9% in faecal samples of children with diarrheal syndrome, and 9.4% in children without diarrhoea [22]. From 2005 to 2009, 5443 strains of Campylobacter spp. were sampled from the faeces of children with diarrhoea at the Red Cross Children’s Hospital in Cape Town (South Africa), of which 40% were C. jejuni; the second most common species were C. concisus (24.6%) [23]. In general, it can be concluded that C. jejuni and other species of the genus Campylobacter are significant for children in most regions of Africa.

Reducing disease risks and preventing campylobacteriosis in the population are primarily associated with the idea of reservoirs/factors of transmission of infectious agents [6]. The most important reservoir/factor of transmission of C. jejuni and C. coli pathogens for humans is industrial poultry: chickens, turkeys, ducks, geese, etc., among which the leading place is occupied by broiler chickens raised on poultry farms [9]. Numerous epidemiological studies have shown that Campylobacter infection caused by chicken meat consumption is more often recorded in urban residents than in rural residents [26]. However, there is evidence that other types of Campylobacter are often sampled from chickens in various regions. This is due to the high level of Campylobacter spp. among broiler chickens. On poultry farms Campylobacter are found in the environment including soil, water sources, dust, building surfaces and air [11]. International trade in broiler chickens, industrial poultry products and feed contributes to the overall burden of Campylobacter infection. In Switzerland 71% of campylobacteriosis cases were caused by poultry products [25, 26]. Given that C. jejuni strains survive in chicken faeces up to six days after isolation, they can be a potential source of environmental pollution, and the use of poultry manure as fertiliser is a factor in human infection. According to the Food Standards Agency in the UK, 72.9% of chicken carcasses were contaminated with Campylobacter spp. between 2014 and 2015, with 18.9% of them characterised by significant contamination (> 10 000 CFU/g) [16, 19].

Considering the above, the purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of thermotolerant Campylobacter in the Republic of Guinea among patients of various ages with diarrheal syndrome and chickens with various types of livestock management.

Materials and methods

The study was conducted in the period from 2019 to 2022 in the province of Kindia (Republic of Guinea), in a laboratory of Guinea-Russian Research Centre of Epidemiology and Prevention of Infectious Diseases (Kindia, Republic of Guinea).

724 items of faeces sampled from patients with diarrheal syndrome were studied, among them 73 from children aged 0 to 5, 127 from children aged 6 to 17, and 524 from humans aged 18 and older, as well as 283 samples of faeces of chickens raised on private farms and five poultry farms in the province. The samples were delivered to the laboratory in a Cary–Blair Transport Medium in a refrigerated container in 4–8 hours.

For bacteriological method, the following media (Oxoid, UK) were used: 1. Campylobacter Blood-Free Selective Agar Base and CCDA Selective Supplement; 2. Selective medium carbon agar and a Selective Supplement (cefoperazone and teicoplanin); 3. Blood agar Muller–Hinton Agar, with 5% Defibrinated Horse Blood (E&O Laboratories limited) and culture growth supplement to increase Campylobacter aerotolerance. Inoculation on the blood agar was performed using cellulose acetate filters (Sartorius Stedim Biotech) with a pore diameter of 0.45 μm. The cultures were incubated in a microaerobic atmosphere at 42°C for 48 hours.

Traditional routine tests based on the determination of key phenotypic features were used for primary identification: cell morphology and Gram staining, production of cytochrome oxidase and catalase, hydrolysis of sodium hippurate and indoxyl acetate. The second identification level was performed using MALDI-ToF mass spectrometry (Bruker Daltonik MALDI Biotyper).

The susceptibility of thermotolerant Campylobacter strains to antimicrobial agents was determined by disc-diffusion method using Muller-Hinton Agar (Oxoid), 5% Defibrinated Horse Blood (E&O Laboratories limited) and 20 mg/l of β-NAD. Results were interpreted according EUCAST criteria, versions 2019–2022 (https://www.eucast.org/ast_of_bacteria/previous_versions_of_documents).

In parallel with the culture method, faeces samples from patients with diarrheal syndrome was examined by PCR method with fluorescence in situ hybridization using the Russian reagent kit AmpliSense® OKI screen-FL to identify and differentiate the DNA of Campylobacter microorganisms (thermophilic Campylobacter spp.)

Statistical processing of results. The obtained data were processed using the computer program Excel (Microsoft Office). Fisher’s exact test was used to assess the statistical significance of differences in indicators (frequency, proportion). Differences were considered statistically significant at a 95% confidence interval (p < 0.05).

Results

Thermotolerant Campylobacter spp. was cultured in 65 out of 724 faecal samples from patients with acute diarrhoea (8.98%). In children under 5 years old, they were found three times more often than in adults (20.55% vs 7.06%, respectively), p ≤ 0.05 (Table 1). Molecular markers of thermotolerant Campylobacter were detected in 72 samples (9.94%).

 

Table 1. Frequency of sampling Campylobacter spp. in patients of various ages

Age

Total samples

Frequency of findings, n (%)

95% CI

0–5

73

15 (20.55%)

12.87–31.18

6–17

127

13 (10.23%)

6.08–16.73

18 and older

524

37 (7.06%)

5.17–9.58

Total

724

65 (8.98%)

7.11–11.28

 

Table 2. Frequency of findings for C. jejuni and C. coli sampled from humans and intestinal contents of chickens kept on personal farming and poultry farms

Type of Campylobacter

Humans

n (%)

95% CI

Chickens personal farming

n (%)

95% CI

Chickens poultry farms

n (%)

95% CI

C. jejuni

54 (7.46%)

5.76–9.61

46 (34.85%)

27.25–43.30

82 (54.31%)

46.35–62.04

C. coli

11 (1.52%)

0.85–2.70

50 (37.88%)

30.06–46.39

59 (39.07%)

31.65–47.03

Not found

659 (90.61%)

88.72–92.89

36 (27.27%)

20.40–35.43

10 (6.62%)

3.63–11.76

Total

724 (100%)

99.47–100

132 (100%)

67.79–82.27

151 (100%)

58.37–73.29

 

Thermotolerant Campylobacter were found in 237 out of 283 (83.75%) samples of chicken intestinal contents, regardless of the livestock management type (personal farming or poultry farms). In chickens raised free-range on personal farming, Campylobacter spp. was found in 96 out of 132 samples studied (72.73%). In poultry farm broilers, thermotolerant Campylobacter was detected in 141 out of 151 samples, which was 93.38%. The use of membrane filters and non-selective media made it possible to identify three strains of closely related microorganisms (Arcobacter cryaerophilus) in the samples studied, which will not be discussed in this paper since they are not pathogenic to humans.

Of the 237 Campylobacter strains, 128 were identified as C. jejuni and 109 as C. coli, representing 54.0% and 46.0%, respectively. Identification using classical tests of six strains of C. jejuni showed questionable results after the hippurate hydrolysis test. The use of MALDI-ToF mass spectrometry and PCR with species-specific primers allowed for the correct culture identification.

To assess the prevalence of resistance strains of Campylobacter spp., were conducted a screening of sampled cultures for clinically significant drugs. Were studied 302 strains of thermotolerant Campylobacter spp. sampled from humans (65 strains), as well as from chicken intestinal contents (237 strains) of chickens kept in different livestock management types: 96 strains from personal farming and 141 strains from five poultry farms (Table 3). 212 strains (70.20%) of Campylobacter spp. were susceptible to all antibiotics whereas 90 (29.80%) were resistant to one or several agents.

 

Table 3. Antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter spp. strains sampled in Kindia, Republic of Guinea, 2019–2022

Antibiotic

Humans (n = 65)

n (%)

Chickens personal farming (n = 96)

n (%)

Chickens poultry farms (n = 141)

n (%)

Total (n = 302)

n (%)

Tetracycline

26 (40.00%)

4 (4.17%)

60 (42.55%)

90 (29.80%)

Erythromycin

4 (6.15%)

0 (0%)

16 (11.35%)

20 (6.62%)

Ciprofloxacin

8 (12.31%)

1 (1.04%)

32 (22.70%)

41 (13.58%)

 

When it comes to the general population of strains, Campylobacter spp. strains sampled from humans were resistant to tetracycline (40.0%), p ≤ 0.05, significantly more often. The proportion of strains resistant to erythromycin and ciprofloxacin was 6.15% and 12.31%, respectively. At the same time, there were no significant differences in the levels of resistance to these drugs (p ≥ 0.05).

Among the strains sampled from the intestinal contents of chickens kept on poultry farms, strains resistant to tetracycline were significantly more common as they accounted for (42.55%), p ≤ 0.05. As for fluoroquinolones which had previously been widely used in veterinary medicine (enrofloxacin), 22.70% of strains were resistant; 11.35% were resistant to erythromycin. No significant differences were identified.

The proportion of strains sampled from the faeces of chickens kept on private farms resistant to tetracycline was 4.17%, whereas the proportion of strains resistant to ciprofloxacin amounted to 1.04%. At the same time, all strains remained susceptible to erythromycin.

The analysis of combined resistance showed that 18.46% of strains sampled from humans were characterized by resistance to two antibiotics: 8 to tetracycline and ciprofloxacin, 4 to erythromycin and tetracycline. Strains from livestock kept on poultry farms with phenotypes of combined resistance were sampled almost twice as often (1.84).

Discussion

Bacteria of the genus Campylobacter are among the leading causative agents of acute intestinal infections of bacterial etiology in residents of developed countries, exceeding in some regions the frequency of registration of salmonellosis and escherichiosis. In a third of cases, they are the cause of “travelers’ diarrhea” among residents of economically developed countries visiting regions with a high degree of circulation of Campylobacter spp. among the population, animals and environmental objects [15]. According to the latest estimates of the World Health Organization, campylobacteriosis is one of the most common infectious diseases with foodborne transmission. Campylobacteriosis is registered in all age groups, most often among children aged from one year to 3–5 years; a relative increase in cases of disease is observed in older children and young people (compared to other age categories) [4, 11, 18, 23].

Our studies showed that the campylobacteriosis accounted for 8.98% in the etiological structure of diarrheal diseases in individuals residing in the Republic of Guinea in 2019–2022. Analysis of the age structure confirmed that thermotolerant Campylobacter are common pathogens among the child population: C. jejuni and C. coli were detected in one in five children under 5 ages. C. jejuni (83.08%) were significantly predominant in the Campylobacter infection structure compared to C. coli (16.92%), p ≤ 0.05.

The incidence of Campylobacter colienteritis, as well as the frequency of detection of thermotolerant campylobacters in chickens in different countries varies very widely. Thus, in the countries of the European Union, where monitoring has been carried out for many years, the incidence is at the level of 61.4–66.5‰, varying from < 5.8‰ in Bulgaria, Latvia, Portugal to 230.0‰ in the Czech Republic. Poultry meat is a transmission factor in campylobacteriosis. The frequency of detecting Campylobacter spp. in chickens in different countries varies in wide ranges [3, 16, 19, 25]. As our studies have shown, the level of Campylobacter spp. among chickens was high (82.57%) and ranged from 70.58% in chickens kept free-range on personal farming to 93.37% in broilers kept on poultry farms. There were no significant differences in the species structure: C. jejuni and C. coli were distinguished with almost the same frequency of 54.0% and 46.0% (p ≥ 0.05). If we talk about the frequency of detection of Campylobacter in chickens, our data are consistent with the results of other authors [9, 11, 14], however, sometimes comparison is difficult due to differences in methodological approaches to research. In our work, we assessed the distribution of thermotolerant campylobacters in the chicken population, while most modern studies deal with the frequency and intensity of contamination of chicken meat, i.e. product prepared for shipment to the consumer [19].

In clinical practice, for the treatment of moderate and severe forms of campylobacteriosis, the prescription of broad-spectrum antibiotics is regulated, among which the drugs of choice are macrolides, and mainly azithromycin. Along with antibiotics of this group, aminoglycosides, quinolones, tetracyclines, chloramphenicol, nitrofurans and carbapenems are recognized as alternative and effective therapeutic drugs. Fluoroquinolones, previously widely used for the treatment of campylobacteriosis, contributed to the development of resistance to this group of antibiotics in 50–84% of circulating strains of Campylobacter spp., which made them unsuitable for therapeutic purposes. In recent years, the clinical ineffectiveness of ongoing antibacterial therapy has been accompanied by the emergence of a large number of resistant strains. A feature of the formation of resistance in Campylobacter is not only the rapid onset of the effect of insensitivity of strains to the action of antibiotics, but also the multiple nature of this phenomenon. In countries where surveillance of campylobacteriosis pathogens has been carried out in recent years, it has been noted that the population of Campylobacter spp. is dominated by strains characterized by multidrug resistance [12, 24, 26]. In 2017, WHO published a list of 12 bacterial priority pathogens that pose the greatest threat to human health. Campylobacter spp. due to the need for the creation of new AMPs, those resistant to fluoroquinolones are classified as a group of microorganisms with a high level of priority (https://www.who.int/news/item/27-02-2017-who-publishes-list-of-bacteria-for-which-new-antibiotics-are-urgently-needed).

Thermophilic Campylobacter spp. are among the most difficult microorganisms to cultivate. In the laboratory diagnosis of campylobacteriosis, the most difficult task is to isolate a pure culture of the pathogen from stool samples due to their massive concomitant microbial contamination. In recent years, the use of molecular research methods has been considered not as an alternative, but as a mandatory addition to regulated diagnostic regimens for acute intestinal infections, allowing for the rapid and effective identification of pathogens of acute intestinal infections, including thermophilic Campylobacter spp. At the same time, it does not imply species identification and determination of sensitivity to antibiotics [2, 7, 10].

Conclusion

Thus, due to the widespread prevalence of thermotolerant Campylobacter spp., infectious diseases caused by them remain a topical issue. Successful use of molecular diagnostic methods along with traditional culture inoculation methods makes it possible to effectively assess the prevalence of Campylobacter in poultry and to enact effective control strategies to prevent campylobacteriosis in individuals residing in the Republic of Guinea. Studying the distribution and resistance to antibiotics in the population of C. jejuni and C. coli among poultry could make it possible to develop new approaches to confirming the significance of their foodborne nature and to improve the national disease prevention system to reduce the risk of contamination with Campylobacter pathogens through industrial poultry products as well as infection burden levels in the population.

Additional information

Author contributions. For research articles with several authors, a short paragraph specifying their individual contributions must be provided. The following statements should be used Conceptualization, L.K. and R.B.; methodology, M.M.; software, R.B. and M.M.; validation, Z.M., M.M. and L.K.; formal analysis, R.B.; investigation, M.M.; resources, R.B. and L.K.; data curation, M.M. and Z.M.; writing — original draft preparation, Z.M.; writing — review and editing, L.K.; visualization, Z.M.; supervision, M.M.; project administration, L.K.; funding acquisition, L.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding. This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of interest. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Disclaimer/publisher’s note. The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

×

About the authors

R. Balde

Research Institute of Applied Biology of Guinea

Email: makmaria@mail.ru

Researcher, Department of Bacteriology

Гвинея, Kindia

Z. N. Matveeva

St. Petersburg Pasteur Institute

Email: makmaria@mail.ru

PhD (Medicine), Leading Researcher, Laboratory of Enteric Infections

Россия, St. Petersburg

L. A. Kaftyreva

St. Petersburg Pasteur Institute; I.I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University

Email: makmaria@mail.ru

DSc (Medicine), Leading Researcher, Typhoid Epidemiology Research Group; Professor, Department of Medical Microbiology

Россия, St. Petersburg; St. Petersburg

Maria A. Makarova

St. Petersburg Pasteur Institute; I.I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: makmaria@mail.ru

DSc (Medicine), Senior Researcher, Laboratory of Enteric Infections; Associate Professor, Department of Medical Microbiology

Россия, St. Petersburg; St. Petersburg

References

  1. Bian X., Garber J.M., Cooper K.K., Huynh S., Jones J., Mills M.K., Rafala D., Nasrin D., Kotloff K.L., Parker C.T., Tennant S.M., Miller W.G., Szymanski C.M. Campylobacter Abundance in Breastfed Infants and Identification of a New Species in the Global Enterics Multicenter Study. mSphere, 2020, vol. 5, no. 1: e00735-19. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00735-19
  2. Buss J.E., Cresse M., Doyle S., Buchan B.W., Craft D.W., Young S. Campylobacter culture fails to correctly detect Campylobacter in 30% of positive patient stool specimens compared to non-cultural methods. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis., 2019, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 1087–1093. doi: 10.1007/s10096-019-03499-x
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guillain-Barré Syndrome. 2022. URL: https://cdc.gov/campylobacter/guillain-barre.html
  4. Chlebicz A., Śliżewska K. Campylobacteriosis, Salmonellosis, Yersiniosis, and Listeriosis as Zoonotic Foodborne Diseases: A Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health, 2018, vol. 15, no. 5: 863. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15050863
  5. Costa D., Iraola G. Pathogenomics of Emerging Campylobacter Species. Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 2019, vol. 32, no. 4: e00072-18. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00072-18
  6. Dai L., Sahin O., Grover M., Zhang Q. New and alternative strategies for the prevention, control, and treatment of antibiotic-resistant Campylobacter. Transl. Res., 2020, vol. 223, pp. 76–88. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2020.04.009
  7. Dunn S.J., Pascoe B., Turton J., Fleming V., Diggle M., Sheppard S.K., McNally A., Manning G. Genomic epidemiology of clinical Campylobacter spp. at a single health trust site. Microb. Genom., 2018, vol. 4, no. 10: e000227. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000227
  8. Fitzgerald C. Campylobacter. Clin. Lab. Med., 2015, vol. 35, pp. 289–298. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2015.03.001
  9. Garin B., Gouali M., Wouafo M., Perchec A.M., Pham M.T., Ravaonindrina N., Urbès F., Gay M., Diawara A., Leclercq A., Rocourt J., Pouillot R. Prevalence, quantification and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter spp. on chicken neck-skins at points of slaughter in 5 major cities located on 4 continents. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 2012, vol. 157, no. 1, pp. 102–107. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.04.020
  10. Gharbi M., Béjaoui A., Ben Hamda C., Ghedira K., Ghram A., Maaroufi A. Distribution of virulence and antibiotic resistance genes in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolated from broiler chickens in Tunisia. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect., 2022, vol. 55, no. 6 (Pt 2), pp. 1273–1282. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2021.07.001
  11. Higham L.E., Scott C., Akehurst K., Dring D., Parnham A., Waterman M., Bright A. Effects of financial incentives and cessation of thinning on prevalence of Campylobacter: a longitudinal monitoring study on commercial broiler farms in the UK. Vet. Rec., 2018, vol. 183, no. 19: 595. doi: 10.1136/vr.104823
  12. Hlashwayo D.F., Sigaúque B., Noormahomed E.V., Afonso S.M.S., Mandomando I.M., Bila C.G. A systematic review and meta-analysis reveal that Campylobacter spp. and antibiotic resistance are widespread in humans in sub-Saharan Africa. PLoS One, 2021, vol. 16, no. 1: e0245951. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245951
  13. Igwaran A., Okoh A.I. Human campylobacteriosis: a public health concern of global importance. Heliyon, 2019, vol. 5, no. 11: e02814. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02814
  14. Kaakoush N.O., Castaño-Rodríguez N., Mitchell H.M., Man S.M. Global Epidemiology of Campylobacter Infection. Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 2015, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 687–720. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00006-15
  15. Kreling V., Falcone F.H., Kehrenberg C., Hensel A. Campylobacter sp.: Pathogenicity factors and prevention methods-new molecular targets for innovative antivirulence drugs? Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2020, vol. 104, no. 24, pp. 10409–10436. doi: 10.1007/s00253-020-10974-5
  16. Lake I.R., Colón-González F.J., Takkinen J., Rossi M., Sudre B., Dias J.G., Tavoschi L., Joshi A., Semenza J.C., Nichols G. Exploring Campylobacter seasonality across Europe using The European Surveillance System (TESSy), 2008 to 2016. Euro Surveill., 2019, vol. 24, no. 13: 1800028. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.13.180028
  17. Liu F., Ma R., Wang Y., Zhang L. The Clinical Importance of Campylobacter concisus and Other Human Hosted Campylobacter Species. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol., 2018, no. 8: 243. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00243
  18. Mason J., Iturriza-Gomara M., O’Brien S.J., Ngwira B.M., Dove W., Maiden M.C., Cunliffe N.A. Campylobacter infection in children in Malawi is common and is frequently associated with enteric virus co-infections. PLoS One, 2013, vol. 8, no. 3: e59663. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059663
  19. Osimani A., Aquilanti L., Pasquini M., Clementi F. Prevalence and risk factors for thermotolerant species of Campylobacter in poultry meat at retail in Europe. Poult. Sci., 2017, vol. 96, no. 9, pp. 3382–3391. doi: 10.3382/ps/pex143
  20. Paintsil E.K., Ofori L.A., Adobea S., Akenten C.W., Phillips R.O., Maiga-Ascofare O., Lamshöft M., May J., Obiri Danso K., Krumkamp R., Dekker D. Prevalence and antibiotic resistance in Campylobacter spp. isolated from humans and food-producing animals in West Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pathogens, 2022, vol. 11, no. 2: 140. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11020140
  21. Platts-Mills J.A., Liu J., Gratz J., Mduma E., Amour C., Swai N., Taniuchi M., Begum S., Peñataro Yori P., Tilley D.H., Lee G., Shen Z., Whary M.T., Fox J.G., McGrath M., Kosek M., Haque R., Houpt E.R. Detection of Campylobacter in stool and determination of significance by culture, enzyme immunoassay, and PCR in developing countries. J. Clin. Microbiol., 2014, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 1074–80. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02935-13
  22. Randremanana R.V., Randrianirina F., Sabatier P., Rakotonirina H.C., Randriamanantena A., Razanajatovo I.M., Ratovoson R., Richard V. Campylobacter infection in a cohort of rural children in Moramanga, Madagascar. BMC Infect. Dis., 2014, no. 14: 372. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-372
  23. Samie A., Moropeng R.C., Tanih N.F., Dillingham R., Guerrant R., Bessong P.O. Epidemiology of Campylobacter infections among children of 0-24 months of age in South Africa. Arch. Public Health, 2022, vol. 80, no. 1: 107. doi: 10.1186/s13690-022-00850-1
  24. Shen Z., Wang Y., Zhang Q., Shen J. Antimicrobial Resistance in Campylobacter spp. Microbiol. Spectr., 2018, vol. 6, no. 2. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.ARBA-0013-2017
  25. Sasaki Y., Yonemitsu K., Momose Y., Uema M. [Quantitative Survey of Campylobacter on Chicken Livers in Japan]. Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zasshi, 2023, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 214–217. (In Japanese). doi: 10.3358/shokueishi.64.214
  26. Wallace R.L., Bulach D., McLure A., Varrone L., Jennison A.V., Valcanis M., Smith J.J., Polkinghorne B.G., Glass K., Kirk M.D. Antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter spp. causing human infection in Australia: an international comparison. Microb. Drug. Resist., 2021, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 518–528. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2020.0082
  27. Yoo M., Chung S.H., Park Y.S., Oh I.H., Chae W.Y., Kim S.H., Lee K.Y., Song C.W., Son B.K., Kim S.H., Jo Y.K., Jung K.H., Lee H.Y., Chae J.D. Clinical characteristics of Campylobacter enterocolitis in korean adults: a retrospective study at a single center. Korean J. Gastroenterol., 2020, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 188–197. doi: 10.4166/kjg.2020.75.4.188

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2024 Balde R., Matveeva Z.N., Kaftyreva L.A., Makarova M.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 64788 от 02.02.2016.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies